When someone has a belief about something they also have an underlying belief about themselves to support that belief. This is what we call identity – a deeply held belief about who the person is who holds such and such beliefs – which is then applied to “me.” To elicit this level of belief, all you have to do is ask for identity – “What kind of person would believe that?” – notice how I use the word “what” in this context. The word “what” in a question tends to elicit identity statements more often than “how” or “why” questions do.
Using a Validity of Cognition (VoC) scale you can start the releasing process – “On a scale of 0-5 with 5 being absolutely true, how true is your evaluation of such a person who believes/acts that way?” Adjust the question to suit your situation. The essence is to elicit how true their judgment of themselves is – a level of judgment – how strong/intense is their judgment?
Then it’s simply a matter of using a stress-reduction process like Rapid Eye Technology (RET) to diminish the level of belief to zero. I especially like the RET Release and Gather technique to deal with identity issues – actually, you are not releasing identity – you are releasing the intensity of judgments (perceptions) you have about your identity. True identity is never in danger of release.
Continue reading
According to a study of healthy women by Dr. Philippe R. Goldin and associates of the Department of Psychology at Stanford University, published in Biological Psychiatry, emotional suppression strategies actually increased the activity of the emotional areas of the amygdala and insula. In contrast, re-evaluation strategies in which one reconsiders the meaning of an event or situation, tended to significantly lower the activity of these brain regions.
What I saw was clear and distinct as though I was looking out the window at an actual scene. The colors were as clear as broad daylight. What’s more, the scene changed in a logical order; that is, it proceeded like I was watching a movie. My client, too, saw a moving imagery that was spontaneous. I suspect that the frequency triggered spontaneous imagery related to deeper issues that were metaphorically represented.